Evans v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company et al
| Piccola A. Evans |
| Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston, Liberty Life Insurance Company of Boston, CSC Corporation and RBC Corporation |
| 3:2010cv05671 |
| December 14, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| Alameda |
| Maria-Elena James |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
28
ORDER TERMINATING LIMITED SCOPE REPRESENTATION. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 2/21/2012. (cdnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/21/2012)
|
|
Filing
26
STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSING CASE re 25 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER filed by Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge MARIA-ELENA JAMES on 1/25/12. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(bjtS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/25/2012)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER APPOINTING COUNSEL. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on 10/31/2011. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/31/2011)
|
|
Filing
21
ORDER REFERRING PLAINTIFF TO FEDERAL PRO BONO PROJECT FOR PURPOSES OF REPRESENTATION AT SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on 8/25/2011. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/25/2011)
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO FILE CONSENT/DECLINATION. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 3/17/2011. (mejlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/17/2011)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
