Yaldo v. Doe
Plaintiff: Mazin K. Yaldo
Defendant: John Doe
Case Number: 3:2010mc80171
Filed: July 13, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: San Francisco Office
Presiding Judge: Richard Seeborg
Nature of Suit: Other

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 22, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 35 ORDER RE BRIEFING. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 11/22/10. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/22/2010)
September 1, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 22 NOTICE OF REFERENCE, TIME AND PLACE OF HEARING AND ORDER re 8 MOTION to Quash Second Subpoena to Google filed by John Doe. Motion Hearing set for 10/22/2010 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom A, 15th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 9/1/10. (klh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/1/2010)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Yaldo v. Doe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mazin K. Yaldo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Doe
Represented By: Hattem Beydoun
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?