Nunez et al v. Bank of America, N.A.
| Emmanuel Nunez and Arleen Nunez |
| Bank of America, N.A. |
| 3:2011cv00081 |
| January 7, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| Alameda |
| Maxine M. Chesney |
| All Other Real Property |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
28
CLERK'S JUDGMENT in favor of Bank of America, N.A. against Arleen Nunez, Emmanuel Nunez. Bank of Americas motion to dismiss plaintiffs Second Amended Complaintis hereby GRANTED. (tlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/2/2011)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER CONTINUING APRIL 8, 2011 CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE TO JUNE 10, 2011. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on 4/4/2011. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/4/2011)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS; VACATING HEARING. Granting 16 Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint, if any, shall be filed no later than April 12, 2011. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/22/2011)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER DENYING AS MOOT DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS; VACATING HEARING; DIRECTING PLAINTIFFS TO LODGE CHAMBERS COPIES IN COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL ORDER 45 AND THE COURTS STANDING ORDERS. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney.(mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/9/2011)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
