Pomerantz v. The life Insurance Company of North America
Plaintiff: Alan Pomerantz
Defendant: Life Insurance Company of North America, The
Case Number: 3:2011cv00652
Filed: February 11, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: San Francisco Office
County: Los Angeles
Presiding Judge: Maxine M. Chesney
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 26, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 43 ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on October 26, 2011. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/26/2011)
September 13, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 39 ORDER VACATING DEADLINES AND MAY 4, 2012 HEARING; SCHEDULING NOVEMBER 11, 2011 STATUS CONFERENCE. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on September 13, 2011. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/13/2011)
August 25, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 37 STIPULATION AND ORDER modifying Court's Order of 7/22/2011 to require that the submission of the Resolution of Discovery Disputes letter be filed with the Court on or before 9/9/2011 re 36 Stipulation filed by Alan Pomerantz, The Life Insurance Company of North America. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 8/25/11. (ig, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/25/2011)
August 5, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 35 ORDER re 34 Stipulation filed by Alan Pomerantz, Life Insurance Company of North America. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 08/05/2011. (dmrlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/5/2011)
July 19, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 32 ORDER REFERRING TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO PERMIT LIMITED DISCOVERY. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on July 19, 2011. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/19/2011)
May 24, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER GRANTING JOINT REQUEST TO PARTICIPATE IN SCHEDULING CONFERENCE BY TELEPHONE. The parties shall participate in the initial scheduling conference by telephone. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on May 24, 2011. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/24/2011)
May 17, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT. Defendant has an extension to and including May 24, 2011 to answer or otherwise respond to plaintiff's complaint. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on May 17, 2011. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/17/2011)
April 7, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 10 STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR THE SUBSTITUTION OF PARTIES. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 4/6/11. (klh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/7/2011)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Pomerantz v. The life Insurance Company of North America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Alan Pomerantz
Represented By: Thornton Davidson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Life Insurance Company of North America, The
Represented By: Sean Patrick Nalty
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?