Xilinx, Inc. v. Invention Investment Fund I LP et al
| Xilinx, Inc. |
| Invention Investment Fund I LP, Invention Investment Fund II LLC, Intellectual Ventures, LLC, Intellectual Ventures Management LLC, Intellectual Ventures I LLC and Intellectual Ventures II LLC |
| 3:2011cv00671 |
| February 14, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| Santa Clara |
| Paul Singh Grewal |
| Susan Illston |
| Patent |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
142
ORDER, Case reassigned to Hon. Edward J. Davila. Hon. Susan Illston no longer assigned to the case.. Signed by Executive Committee on 3/16/12. (ha, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/16/2012)
|
|
Filing
134
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT (11-0671); ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION TO DISMISS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT (11-4407) (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 1/25/2012)
|
|
Filing
124
ORDER CONTINUING MOTIONS (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/16/2011)
|
|
Filing
102
ORDER allowing the filing of the 2nd Amended Complaint (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/4/2011)
|
|
Filing
96
ORDER re: initial disclosures (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/28/2011)
|
|
Filing
95
ORDER granting extension to deadline to Answer (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/27/2011)
|
|
Filing
92
ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION TO RESPOND TO AMENDED COMPLAINT (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/19/2011)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
