Carnero v. Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation
Gabriela R. Carnero |
Mortgage Electronic Registation Services, Inc., JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Chase Home Finance, LLC, Quality Loan Service Corporation and Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation |
5:2011cv01029 |
March 4, 2011 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Jose Office |
Santa Clara |
Howard R. Lloyd |
All Other Real Property |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 |
Defendant |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 66 JUDGMENT in favor of defendants and against plaintiff. Signed by Judge William Alsup on 3/28/2012. (whasec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/28/2012) |
Filing 55 ODER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO EXPUNGE LIS PENDENS; DENYING REQUEST FOR ATTORNEY'S FEES, AND GRANTING REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE by Hon. William Alsup granting in part and denying in part 15 Motion expunge lis pendens, attorney's fees, judicial notice.(whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/23/2012) |
Filing 33 ORDER RELATING CASES. Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 6/23/11. (dlm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/8/2011) |
Filing 16 Judicial Referral for Purpose of Determining Relationship of Cases. The instant action is hereby referred to the judge presiding in Carnero, et al. v. Washington Mutual (WAMU) Chase Bank, et al., No. C09-05330 JF, for a determination as to whether the cases are related within the meaning of Civil Local Rule 3-12. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 4/21/2011. (hrllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/21/2011) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.