Nimbus Data Systems, Inc. v. Nimble Storage, Inc.
| Nimbus Data Systems, Inc. |
| Nimble Storage, Inc. |
| 3:2011cv01214 |
| March 11, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| San Francisco |
| Richard Seeborg |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1125 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
69
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE 68 OF DISMISSAL. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 5/7/12. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/7/2012)
|
|
Filing
67
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE 65 RESCHEDULING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND VACATING DEADLINES ESTABLISHED IN REVISED CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER IN LIGHT OF TENTATIVE SETTLEMENT. Case Management Conference set for 5/10/2012 10:00 AM in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 3/27/12. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/28/2012)
|
|
Filing
58
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE 57 REVISED CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 12/13/11. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/13/2011)
|
|
Filing
17
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE 16 EXTENDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND HEARING DATE ON NIMBUS DATA SYSTEMS, INC.'S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION. Motion Hearing set for 6/9/2011 01:30 PM in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Richard Seeborg. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 4/15/11. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/15/2011)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
