Palomino v. California Forensic Medical Group et al
| Julio Palomino |
| Bill Cogbill, California Forensic Medical Group, Taylor Fithian and County of Sonoma |
| 3:2011cv01329 |
| March 18, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| Sonoma |
| Maria-Elena James |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
57
ORDER by Judge Maria-Elena James granting 41 Motion for Summary Judgment (cdnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/10/2012)
|
|
Filing
56
ORDER by Chief Magistrate Judge Maria-Elena James granting 53 Stipulation extending deadlines for Expert Disclosures and Expert Discovery. (rmm2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/6/2012)
|
|
Filing
49
ORDER FOR PARTIES TO FILE JOINT STATEMENT OF UNDISPUTED FACTS. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 11/15/2012. (cdnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/15/2012)
|
|
Filing
37
ORDER by Judge Maria-Elena James discharging osc; granting 30 Motion for Summary Judgment (cdnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/10/2012)
|
|
Filing
35
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - Order to Show Cause Hearing set for 10/11/2012 10:00 AM. Show Cause Response due by 9/27/2012.. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 9/18/2012. (cdnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/18/2012)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO FILE CONSENT/DECLINATION. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 4/5/2011. (cdnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/5/2011)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
