Gonda v. Permanente Medical Group, Inc et al
| Thomas A. Gonda, Jr. |
| Permanente Medical Group, Inc and Permanente Medical Group, Inc. Long Term Disability Plan for Physicians |
| 3:2011cv01363 |
| March 22, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| Alameda |
| Samuel Conti |
| Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1001 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
108
ORDER by Judge Samuel Conti denying 104 Motion to Alter Judgment. (sclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/24/2015)
|
|
Filing
102
ORDER by Judge Samuel Conti granting 67 Motion for Summary Judgment (sclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/17/2015)
|
|
Filing
101
ORDER by Judge Samuel Conti denying 98 Motion for Reconsideration (sclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/12/2015)
|
|
Filing
94
ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO AMEND. The Court GRANTS Defendants leave to amend their answer to add the affirmative defense that the Settlement Agreement releases Dr. Gonda's claims. Defendants shall file an amended answer within four (4) days of the signature date of this Order. Signed by Judge Samuel Conti on February 9, 2015. (sclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/9/2015)
|
|
Filing
93
CORRECTION OF DOCKET # 92 . ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Show Cause Response due by 2/9/2015. Signed by Judge Samuel Conti on February 5, 2015. (sclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/5/2015)
|
|
Filing
84
ORDER REQUESTING SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING. Defendants are hereby ORDERED to submit to the Court a supplemental brief of not more than ten (10) pages (1) explaining the delay in raising this issue and (2) establishing that justice requires the Court to grant them leave to amend their answer. Defendants shall submit their brief within fourteen (14) days of the signature date of this Order. Dr. Gonda may submit a supplemental brief on these issues of not more than ten (10) pages within ten (10) days of Defendants' submission. Signed by Judge Samuel Conti on January 6, 2015. (sclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/6/2015)
|
|
Filing
66
ORDER by Judge Samuel Conti granting in part and denying in part 64 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal (sclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/31/2014)
|
|
Filing
58
NOTICE OF REFERENCE AND ORDER RE DISCOVERY PROCEDURES. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 09/12/14. (dmrlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/12/2014)
|
|
Filing
52
Order by Hon. Samuel Conti granting in part and denying in part 45 Motion for Protective Order.(sclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/1/2014)
|
|
Filing
44
Order by Hon. Samuel Conti denying 35 Motion for Summary Judgment.(sclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/16/2014)
|
|
Filing
28
STIPULATION AND ORDER Continuing Case Management Conference. Case Management Statement due by 8/16/2013. Further Case Management Conference set for 8/23/2013 10:00 AM in Courtroom 1, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Samuel Conti on 07/19/2013. (tmi, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/19/2013)
|
|
Filing
21
STIPULATION AND ORDER Continuing Stay for Administrative Appeal. Signed by Judge Samuel Conti on 5/1/12. (tdm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/1/2012)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER STAYING CASE. Signed by Judge Samuel Conti on 9/9/2011. (sclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/9/2011)
|
|
Filing
11
STIPULATION AND ORDER extending Defendants time to respond to the complaint to 6/27/11. Signed by Judge Samuel Conti on 5/27/11. (tdm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/27/2011)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
