Ashraf et al v. Macy's, Inc.
Fawzia Ashraf and Bernd Endres |
Macy's, Inc. |
5:2011cv01487 |
March 28, 2011 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Jose Office |
Santa Barbara |
Paul Singh Grewal |
Motor Vehicle Product Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Defendant |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 40 STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL re 39 Stipulation filed by Macy's, Inc.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 5/18/12. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/18/2012) |
Filing 37 ORDER re 36 Notice (Other) filed by Macy's, Inc. Case Management Statement due by 5/11/2012. Case Management Conference reset for 5/18/2012 09:00 AM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 2/24/12. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/24/2012) |
Filing 24 ORDER REFERRING CASE FOR SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE AND RESETTING CMC. Case Management Conference set for 1/6/2012 09:00 AM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 10/27/11. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/27/2011) |
Filing 22 STANDING ORDER. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 10/5/11. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/5/2011) |
Filing 20 ORDER GRANTING 19 REQUEST BY STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. The Case Management Conference set for 8/12/2011 is CONTINUED to 12/16/2011 10:30 AM in Courtroom 3, 5th Floor, San Jose. Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 8/11/2011. (jflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/11/2011) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.