National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA v. Payless Shoe Source, Inc. et al
National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA |
Payless Shoe Source, Inc. and Collective Brands, Inc. |
3:2011cv01892 |
April 19, 2011 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Francisco Office |
San Francisco |
Edward M. Chen |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 86 ORDER re 84 Stipulated Notice of Dismissal with Prejudice. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 3/15/2013. (emclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/15/2013) |
Filing 85 STIPULATION AND ORDER re 84 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal filed by National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 3/14/13. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/14/2013) |
Filing 81 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Show Cause Response due by 2/22/2013. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 2/15/2013. (emcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/15/2013) |
Filing 79 ORDER resetting further CMC to 4/11/13. Case Management Statement due by 4/4/2013. Further Case Management Conference set for 4/11/2013 10:30 AM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 2/12/13. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/12/2013) |
Filing 75 STIPULATION AND ORDER re 74 Continunace of Further CMC filed by National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA Case Management Statement due by 2/7/2013. Further Case Management Conference set for 2/14/2013 10:30 AM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 12/11/12. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/11/2012) |
Filing 69 ORDER by Judge Edward M. Chen Denying 40 Plaintiff's Motion to Enjoin Defendants from Prosecuting Similar Litigation in Kansas. (emcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/9/2012) |
Filing 54 STIPULATION AND ORDER re 40 MOTION TO ENJOIN DEFENDANTS FROM PROSECUTING SIMILAR LITIGATION IN KANSAS Stipulation to Extend Time to File Reply Brief filed by National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA. Plaintiff's reply due 7/3/12. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 7/2/12. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/2/2012) |
Filing 34 ORDER re 33 Notice of Substitution of Counsel filed by National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 3/28/12. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/28/2012) |
Filing 32 STIPULATION AND ORDER Case Management Statement due by 6/22/2012. Case Management Conference set for 6/29/2012 09:00 AM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 3/14/12. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/14/2012) |
Filing 28 STIPULATION AND ORDER RESETTING CMC re 26 Stipulation filed by Collective Brands, Inc., Payless Shoe Source, Inc. Case Management Conference set for 2/10/2012 09:00 AM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 10/3/11. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/3/2011) |
Filing 20 STIPULATION AND ORDER RESETTING CMC TO 10/7/11 re 19 Stipulation filed by Collective Brands, Inc., Payless Shoe Source, Inc.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 7/28/11. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/28/2011) |
Filing 17 STANDING ORDER. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 7/19/11. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/19/2011) |
Filing 15 STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO ANSWER re 14 Stipulation filed by National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 7/14/11. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/14/2011) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.