Yates v. Martin Brothers Supply Inc et al
| Craig Yates |
| Martin Brothers Supply Inc and Martins Landing LLC |
| 3:2011cv01947 |
| April 21, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| Marin |
| Edward M. Chen |
| Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
21
STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL re 20 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER FOR DISMISSAL THEREON filed by Craig Yates. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 3/6/12. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/6/2012)
|
|
Filing
19
STIPULATION AND ORDER Case Management Statement due by 3/2/2012. Case Management Conference set for 3/9/2012 09:00 AM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 2/9/12. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/9/2012)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER RESETTING CMC. Case Management Statement due by 2/3/2012. Case Management Conference set for 2/10/2012 09:00 AM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 12/16/11. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/16/2011)
|
|
Filing
12
STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO FILE AMENDED ANSWER re 11 Stipulation filed by Martins Landing LLC, Martin Brothers Supply Inc. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 8/11/11. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/11/2011)
|
|
Filing
5
STANDING ORDERS (mjj2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/8/2011)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
