Hard Drive Productions, Inc. v. Does 1-46
| Hard Drive Productions, Inc. |
| Does 1-46, John Doe (IP Address: 24.6.114.15 ), John Doe (IP Address: 67.49.46.27) and John Doe |
| 3:2011cv01959 |
| April 22, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| San Francisco |
| Edward M. Chen |
| Copyrights |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 101 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
44
ORDER by Judge Edward M. Chen Adopting 39 Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation and Denying 23 Defendant's Motion to Quash. (emcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/28/2012)
|
|
Filing
36
ORDER resetting CMC 33 Case Management Statement filed by Hard Drive Productions, Inc. Case Management Statement due by 1/27/2012. Case Management Conference set for 2/3/2012 09:00 AM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 11/14/11. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/14/2011)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER by Judge Edward M. Chen Denying 18 Doe's Motion to Quash. (emcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/23/2011)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER by Judge Edward M. Chen denying 9 Motion to Quash; denying 10 Motion to Quash; denying 12 Motion to Quash (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/16/2011)
|
|
Filing
13
STANDING ORDERS (mjj2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/8/2011)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
