Garcia v. Sony Computer Entertainment America LLC
Henry Garcia |
Sony Computer Entertainment America LLC |
3:2011cv02246 |
May 6, 2011 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Francisco Office |
San Diego |
Richard Seeborg |
Other Fraud |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 70 ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 5/8/12. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/8/2012) |
Filing 49 STIPULATION AND ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON DEFENDANT ACTIVISION'S MOTION TO DISMISS. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 12/1/11. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/1/2011) |
Filing 38 STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE SECOND AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT AND TO SET BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND HEARING DATE ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 10/6/11. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/6/2011) |
Filing 35 ORDER SETTING TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 9/19/11. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/19/2011) |
Filing 13 STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: 12 CONTINUING DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT AND SCHEDULING BRIEFING AND HEARING FOR MOTION TO DISMISS AND MOTION TO STAY DISCOVERY. Case Management Conference set for 8/25/2011 01:30 PM in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 6/1/11. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/1/2011) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.