Morrow v. City of Oakland et al
| Frank Morrow, Jr. |
| Jo Anne Sommerville, Sean Whent, Chris Shannon, Donna Hoppenhauer, John Russo, Anthony Batts, Howard Jordan, Jeffrey Israel, Wayne Tucker, Donald Jeffries and City of Oakland |
| 4:2011cv02351 |
| May 12, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Oakland Office |
| Alameda |
| Laurel Beeler |
| Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
199
ORDER GRANTING 185 DEFENDANTS' AMENDED MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Laurel Beeler on 12/19/2013. (lblc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/19/2013)
|
|
Filing
165
ORDER CONTINUING THE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. The court finds good cause to continue the case management conference for one week to 11:00 a.m. on October 17, 2013. If he prefers, Mr. Morrow may appear at it by telephone. To do so, he should make arrangements with the courtroom deputy Lashanda Scott (415-522-3140) by October 14, 2013. Defendants also may appear at it by telephone, but if they do, they should appear through CourtCall. The parties are directed to meet and confer regardin g scheduling and submit proposals for it in their case management conference statement, which they shall file by October 11, 2013. Defendants still shall file the joint statement of undisputed facts and motion for summary judgment by October 11, 2013. Case Management Statement due by 10/11/2013. Further Case Management Conference set for 10/17/2013 11:00 AM in Courtroom C, 15th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Laurel Beeler on 10/4/2013. (lblc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/4/2013)
|
|
Filing
158
ORDER DIRECTING Plaintiff not to file any more proposed joint statements of undisputed facts. Signed by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler on 4/8/2013. (lblc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/8/2013)
|
|
Filing
144
ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE 134 Defendants' administrative motion re joint statement of undisputed facts. Signed by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler on 3/6/2013.(lblc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/6/2013)
|
|
Filing
113
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER following the November 26, 2012 Further Case Management Conference. Signed by Judge Laurel Beeler on 11/28/2012. (lblc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/28/2012)
|
|
Filing
105
ORDER for supplemental information (Beeler, Laurel) (Filed on 11/26/2012)
|
|
Filing
51
ORDER (1) DIRECTING Defendants to File Reply Brief and (2) CONTINUING Hearings on 39 Defendants' motion to dismiss and 46 Plaintiff's motion to stay. The court ORDERS as follows: 1. Defendants shall file a reply to Mr. Morrows oppositi on by May 14, 2012. 2. The hearings on Defendants' motion to dismiss Mr. Morrow's Second Amended Complaint and Mr. Morrow's motion to stay are continued to June 7, 2012 at 11:00 a.m. in Courtroom C, 15th Floor, United States Di strict Court, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, California, 94102. Motion Hearing set for 6/7/2012 11:00 AM in Courtroom C, 15th Floor, San Francisco before Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler. Signed by Judge Laurel Beeler on 4/27/2012. (lblc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/27/2012)
|
|
Filing
21
ORDER (1) GRANTING 20 Defendants' Motion to Adjust Briefing Schedule and (2) CONTINUING Hearing on 12 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss. See order for details. Plaintiff's opposition is now due by 1/3/2012. Defendants' reply is now due by 1/10/2012. Motion hearing now set for 2/2/2012. Signed by Judge Laurel Beeler on 12/23/2011. (lblc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/23/2011)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
