Crosthwaite et al v. Quinones
| F. G. Crosthwaite, Russell E. Burns, Pension Trust Fund For Operating Engineers, Pensioned Operating Engineers' Health and Welfare Fund and Operating Engineers Local Union No. 3 of the International Union of Operating Engineers, AFL-CIO |
| Jorge Edgard Quinones |
| 3:2011cv02632 |
| June 2, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| Alameda |
| Edward M. Chen |
| Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1001 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
64
JUDGMENT. Signed by Deputy Clerk Betty Lee on 7/24/12. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/24/2012)
|
|
Filing
57
ORDER by Judge Edward M. Chen granting in part and denying in part 31 Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment (emclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/2/2012)
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER resetting cmc Case Management Statement due by 6/22/2012. Case Management Conference set for 6/29/2012 09:00 AM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 2/28/12. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/28/2012)
|
|
Filing
17
STIPULATION AND ORDER SETTING ASIDE DEFAULT re 13 Stipulation filed by Jorge Edgard Quinones. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 8/15/11. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/15/2011)
|
|
Filing
15
STANDING ORDER. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 8/11/11. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/11/2011)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
