Minerva Whitney et al v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation
| Minerva Whitney and Harold Whitney |
| Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation |
| 4:2011cv02894 |
| June 14, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Oakland Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Saundra Brown Armstrong |
| Personal Injury- Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
75
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 74 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL filed by Harold Whitney, Minerva Whitney. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on June 11, 2013. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/11/2013)
|
|
Filing
73
ORDER TO FILE STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on April 25, 2013. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/25/2013)
|
|
Filing
68
SCHEDULING ORDER. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on March 28, 2013. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/28/2013)
|
|
Filing
55
ORDER by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers denying 45 Motion to Stay Case. The May 1, 2012 Hearing date is VACATED. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/25/2012)
|
|
Filing
44
SCHEDULING ORDER [as Modified by the Court]. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 3/19/2012. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/19/2012)
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER re 25 Stipulation, filed by Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, Harold Whitney, Minerva Whitney. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 9/9/11. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/12/2011)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
