Randall et al v. City of Oakland et al
Sharon Randall |
City of Oakland, Howard Jordan and Does 1-25 |
3:2011cv03288 |
July 5, 2011 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Francisco Office |
Alameda |
Jacqueline Scott Corley |
Other Civil Rights |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 31 ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on 5/11/2012. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/11/2012) |
Filing 21 ORDER re Settlement Response due by 2/6/2012 at 4:00 p.m. Signed by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler on 2/6/2012. (ls, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/6/2012) |
Filing 20 ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFFS TO COMPLY WITH SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE PROCEDURES. Signed by Judge Beeler on 2/2/2012. (lblc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/2/2012) |
Filing 18 ORDER granting 17 Stipulation for extension of time to complete settlement conference filed by Sharon Randall. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on 12/16/2011. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/16/2011) |
Filing 15 FILED IN WRONG CASE, PLEASE DISREGARD ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR FTC DOCUMENTS (Dkt. Nos. 138, 144). Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on 11/18/2011. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/18/2011) Modified on 11/18/2011 (ahm, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 12 CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE ORDER NO. 1. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on 10/20/2011. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/20/2011) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.