Electrograph Systems, Inc. et al v. NEC Corporation et al
Electrograph Systems, Inc. and Electrograph Technologies Corp. |
NEC Corporation of America, NEC Display Solutions of America, Inc., NEC Electronics America, Inc., NEC LCD Technologies, Ltd. and NEC Corporation |
Viewsonic Corporation |
3:2011cv03342 |
July 8, 2011 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Francisco Office |
XX US, Outside State |
Susan Illston |
Antitrust |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 64 ORDER DENYING MOTION TO CERTIFY FOR INTERLOCUTORY REVIEW THE COURT'S ORDER DENYING IN PART NEC DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS (ELECTROGRAPH) (4800) (49) (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 3/14/2012) |
Filing 47 ORDER DENYING NEC/DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS ELECTROGRAPH COMPLAINT FOR IMPROPER VENUE(Illston, Susan) (Filed on 2/6/2012) |
Filing 40 ORDER GRANTING IN PART NEC DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 1/18/2012) |
Filing 35 ORDER continuing motions by NEC (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/16/2011) |
Filing 30 ORDER continuing motion hearing.(COUNSEL IS REMINDED TO IDENTIFY THE DOCKET NUMBERS TO ALL MOTIONS THEY WISH TO CONTINUE SO THAT THE COURT MAY CONTINUE THE CORRECT HEARING) (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/13/2011) |
Filing 23 ORDER re: briefing schedule (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/16/2011) |
Filing 15 ORDER re: extension of time to respond to complaint (NEC CORP) (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/12/2011) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.