Alakozai v. Chase Investment Services Corp.
| Steven Pitts and Michael Alakozai |
| Chase Investment Services Corp. |
| 3:2011cv03499 |
| July 15, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| Alameda |
| Maxine M. Chesney |
| Other Labor Litigation |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
36
ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE TO THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on November 1, 2011. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/1/2011)
|
|
Filing
30
ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. The Case Management Conference currently scheduled for November 4, 2011 shall be vacated and continued to January 13, 2012 at 10:30 a.m. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on October 26, 2011. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/26/2011)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER FOR FILING OF SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT. The Second Amended Complaint shall be filed by plaintiffs no later than October 7, 2011. Defendant's response to the First Amended Complaint due October 13, 2011 is hereby vacated. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on October 3, 2011. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/3/2011)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFFS TO LODGE CHAMBERS COPY IN COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL ORDER 45 AND THE COURT'S STANDING ORDERS. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on September 28, 2011. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/28/2011)
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFFS TO SHOW CAUSE WHY COMPLAINT SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION; EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT. Plaintiffs are ordered to show cause, no later than September 22, 2011, why the First Amended Complaint should not be dismissed. The time for defendant to respond to the FAC is extended to October 13, 2011. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on September 8, 2011. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/8/2011)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER RE: STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS' FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT. Pursuant to stipulation, the defendant shall have until September 22, 2011 to respond to the first amended complaint. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on 8/26/2011. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/26/2011)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
