Quirk v. Sony Pictures Entertainment Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Joe Quirk
Defendant: Sony Pictures Entertainment Inc., Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc., Pariah, David Koepp and John Kamps
Case Number: 3:2011cv03773
Filed: August 1, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: San Francisco Office
County: Alameda
Presiding Judge: Richard Seeborg
Nature of Suit: Copyrights
Cause of Action: 17 U.S.C. ยง 501
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 2, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 118 ORDER by Judge Richard Seeborg granting 69 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 93 Motion for Summary Judgment (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/2/2013)
March 22, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 116 STIPULATION AND ORDER GRANTING SHORT CONTINUANCE OF THE DISCOVERY CUTOFF. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 3/22/13. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/22/2013)
January 23, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 109 ORDER CONTINUING TRIAL DATE. Pretrial Conference set for 4/25/2013 10:00 AM; Jury Selection set for 5/7/2013 09:00 AM; Jury Trial set for 5/7/2013 09:00 AM in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Richard Seeborg. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 1/23/13. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/23/2013)
December 12, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 92 STIPULATION AND ORDER RE RESPONSES TO FIFTH AMENDED COMPLAINT. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 12/12/12. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/12/2012)
November 28, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 83 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO PERMIT PLAINTIFF TO FILE A FIFTH AMENDED COMPLAINT TO ADD DEFENDANT KOEPPS LOAN-OUT COMPANY AS A DEFENDANT. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 11/28/12. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/28/2012)
October 23, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 73 ORDER by Judge Seeborg granting 72 Stipulation (rslc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/23/2012)
July 26, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 57 STIPULATION AND ORDER RE 56 REGARDING FILING OF PLAINTIFFS FOURTH AMENDED COMPLAINT, DEFENDANTS RESPONSES THERETO AND AMENDED SCHEDULE RE DISCOVERY AND PRE-TRIAL DATES. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 7/26/12. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/26/2012)
February 24, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 39 STIPULATION AND ORDER RE 36 TO PERMIT PLAINTIFF TO FILE PORTIONS OF THE THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT UNDER SEAL. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 2/24/12. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/24/2012)
January 20, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 35 STIPULATION AND ORDER RE 34 SCHEDULE FOR DISCOVERY AND OTHER PRETRIAL DATES. Pretrial Conference set for 3/7/2013; Jury Selection set for 3/25/2013 09:00 AM; Jury Trial set for 3/25/2013 09:00 AM in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Richard Seeborg. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 1/20/12. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/20/2012)
December 28, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 30 STIPULATION AND STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER RE 29 Stipulation filed by David Koepp, John Kamps, Pariah, Sony Pictures Entertainment Inc., Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 12/27/11. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/28/2011)
November 15, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 26 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO TAKE DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS OFF CALENDAR TO PERMIT PLAINTIFF TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 11/15/11. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/15/2011)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Quirk v. Sony Pictures Entertainment Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joe Quirk
Represented By: Mario R Nicholas
Represented By: Jeffrey Taylor Makoff
Represented By: Heather A Landis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sony Pictures Entertainment Inc.
Represented By: Christopher G. Caldwell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc.
Represented By: Christopher G. Caldwell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Pariah
Represented By: Christopher G. Caldwell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: David Koepp
Represented By: Christopher G. Caldwell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Kamps
Represented By: Christopher G. Caldwell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?