Sutton v. Apple Computers Itunes et al
| Korvel M. Sutton |
| Apple Computers Itunes, Donald B. McMillan and James Callon |
| 4:2011cv03911 |
| August 9, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Oakland Office |
| Alameda |
| Laurel Beeler |
| Copyrights |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 6, 2013. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 REPORT on the filing of an action regarding Copyrights (cc: form mailed to register). (cjl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/9/2011) |
| Filing 4 ADR SCHEDULING ORDER: Case Management Statement due by 2/2/2012. Case Management Conference set for 2/9/2012 10:30 AM in Courtroom 4, 3rd Floor, Oakland. (Attachments: # 1 Standing Order)(cjl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/9/2011) |
| Filing 3 CONSENT to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Korvel M. Sutton. (cjl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/9/2011) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Korvel M. Sutton. (cjl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/9/2011) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT (no process) (with jury demand) against Apple Computers Itunes, James Callon, Donald B. McMillan. Filed by Korvel M. Sutton. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet)(cjl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/9/2011) |
| CASE DESIGNATED for Electronic Filing. (cjl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/9/2011) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
