Bay Area Painters and Tapers Pension Fund et al v. Di Girolamo Painting and Decorating, Inc.
| Marion Bourboulis, District Council 16 International Union of Painters and Allied Trades, Bay Area Painters and Tapers Pension Fund, Les Proteau, Charles Del Monte, District Council 16 Northern California Health and Welfare Trust Fund, Doug Christopher, John Maggiore and District Council 16 Northern California Journeyman and Apprentice Training Trust Fund |
| Di Girolamo Painting and Decorating, Inc. and Edwin Mark Di Girolamo |
| 3:2011cv03964 |
| August 12, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| Alameda |
| William Alsup |
| Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1001 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
13
JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO STIPULATION re 12 Stipulation,,, filed by Bay Area Painters and Tapers Pension Fund, Les Proteau, Doug Christopher, John Maggiore, District Council 16 Northern California Journeyman and Apprentice Training Trust Fund, Marion Bo urboulis, District Council 16 Northern California Health and Welfare Trust Fund, District Council 16 International Union of Painters and Allied Trades, Charles Del Monte. Signed by Judge Alsup on October 14, 2011. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/14/2011)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
