Volumecocomo Apparel, Inc. v. Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Volumecocomo Apparel, Inc.
Defendant: Expeditors International of Washington, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2011cv04201
Filed: August 25, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: San Francisco Office
County: Los Angeles
Presiding Judge: Maria-Elena James
Nature of Suit: Marine
Cause of Action: 46 U.S.C. ยง 741
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 26, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 82 ORDER re 69 MOTION Plaintiff's Request for Relief From Order Due to Inadvertence and Clerical Error re 68 Order on Motion to Compel, Order on Ex Parte Application,, filed by Volumecocomo Apparel, Inc.. Signed by Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 06/26/2012. (kawlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/26/2012)
June 21, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 79 ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE to the Central District of California.. Signed by Judge Samuel Conti on 6/21/2012. (sclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/21/2012)
June 14, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 74 ORDER re 69 MOTION Plaintiff's Request for Relief From Order Due to Inadvertence and Clerical Error re 68 Order on Motion to Compel, Order on Ex Parte Application,, filed by Volumecocomo Apparel, Inc.. Signed by Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 06/14/2012. (kawlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/14/2012)
June 11, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 72 PRETRIAL ORDER. Signed by Judge Samuel Conti on 6/11/2012. (sclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/11/2012)
June 7, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 71 ORDER for Supplemental Briefing and Order Vacating June 8, 2012 Hearing.. Signed by Judge Samuel Conti on 6/7/2012. (sclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/7/2012)
May 31, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 68 ORDER by Judge Kandis A. Westmore granting in part and denying in part 61 Motion to Compel; Ex Parte Application 64 is denied as moot per mutual agreement of the parties. Plaintiff Volumecocomo Apparrel's motion for attendant fees and expenses is denied. (kawlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/31/2012)
May 25, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 67 ORDER OF REFERENCE TO A MAGISTRATE JUDGE re 65 Order Referring Case to Magistrate Judge for Discovery. Signed by Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 5/25/12. (sis, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/25/2012)
April 18, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 44 ORDER by Judge Samuel Conti granting 42 Motion for Leave to File; granting 43 Motion for Leave to File (sclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/18/2012)
April 9, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 41 Order by Hon. Samuel Conti granting 27 Gemadept's Motion to Dismiss.(sclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/9/2012)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Volumecocomo Apparel, Inc. v. Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Volumecocomo Apparel, Inc.
Represented By: Marilyn Raia
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Expeditors International of Washington, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?