Scandlon v. Blue Coat Systems, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Robert A. Scandlon, Jr.
Defendant: Blue Coat Systems, Inc., Brian M. NeSmith and Gordon C. Brooks
Case Number: 3:2011cv04293
Filed: August 30, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: San Francisco Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Richard Seeborg
Nature of Suit: Securities/Commodities/Exchanges
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 78
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 23, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 79 ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 9/20/13. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/23/2013)
March 5, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 68 STIPULATION AND ORDER RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Case Management Conference set for 11/14/2013 10:00 AM in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, San Francisco.Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 3/4/13. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/5/2013)
January 25, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 64 ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS WITH LEAVE TO AMEND. Further Case Management Conference set for 3/21/2013 10:00 AM in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, San Francisco.Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 1/25/13. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/25/2013)
August 29, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 61 STIPULATION AND ORDER RE 58 CHANGING SCHEDULED DATES FOR MOTION TO DISMISS HEARING AND CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Motion Hearing set for 10/4/2012 01:30 PM in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Richard Seeborg. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 8/29/12. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/29/2012)
December 22, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 43 STIPULATION AND ORDER RE 42 SETTING DATE FOR FILING OF AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT; ESTABLISHING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR RESPONSIVE MOTIONS AND CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Initial Case Management Conference set for 9/6/2012 10:00 AM in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 12/22/11. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/22/2011)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Scandlon v. Blue Coat Systems, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Robert A. Scandlon, Jr.
Represented By: Mary K. Blasy
Represented By: Marshall P. Dees
Represented By: Michael I. Fistel, Jr.
Represented By: David R. Scott
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Blue Coat Systems, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Brian M. NeSmith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Gordon C. Brooks
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?