Len v. JPMorgan Chase, NA et al
Plaintiff: Vanna Len
Defendant: JPMorgan Chase, NA and Bank of America N.A.
Case Number: 3:2011cv04439
Filed: September 7, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: San Francisco Office
County: Santa Clara
Presiding Judge: Richard Seeborg
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 11, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 74 ORDER GRANTING VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on October 11, 2013. ***Civil Case Terminated. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/11/2013)
March 22, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 65 ORDER RE: STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS AND MEDIATION DEADLINE; SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE. The hearing on defendant's motion to dismiss is continued from April 18, 2013 to June 14, 2013. Plaintiff's o pposition, if any, shall be filed no later than May 13, 2013. Defendant's reply, if any, shall be filed no later than May 20, 2013. The mediation deadline currently set for June 1, 2013 is continued to August 1, 2013. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on March 22, 2013. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/22/2013)
December 3, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 57 ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST TO APPEAR TELEPHONICALLY AT THE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. All parties are directed to appear telephonically at the case management conference. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on December 3, 2012. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/3/2012)
November 14, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 51 ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANT TO MEET AND CONFER; DIRECTING PARTIES TO FILE JOINT STATEMENT; CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Defendant is ordered to meet and confer with plaintiff no later than November 27, 2012, and to file with plaintiff a Joint Case Management Statement no later than November 30, 2012. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on November 14, 2012. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/14/2012)
September 13, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 49 ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME; DEEMING MOTION TO DISMISS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The deadline to extend mediation is extended by 60 days. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on September 13, 2012. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/13/2012)
September 11, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 47 ORDER. The parties are directed to file, no later than September 24, 2012, a Status Report advising the Court as to the current status of the case. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on September 11, 2012. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/11/2012)
July 16, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 46 ORDER RE: REQUEST FOR SUBSTITUTION OF ATTORNEY. The plaintiff's request for substitution of attorney is granted. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on July 16, 2012. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/16/2012)
May 30, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 43 ORDER RE: DEFENDANTS' REQUEST TO APPEAR TELEPHONICALLY AT CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on May 30, 2012. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/30/2012)
May 29, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 41 ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST TO APPEAR TELEPHONICALLY AT THE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Plaintiff's request to appear telephonically at the Case Management Conference is granted. All parties shall appear telephonically at said Case Management Conference. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on May 29, 2012. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/29/2012)
March 16, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 31 ORDER granting substitution of counsel. Signed by Judge Illston on 3/14/12. (tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/16/2012)
February 1, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 27 ORDER REFERRING CASE TO ADR UNIT FOR ASSESSMENT TELEPHONE CONFERENCE AND VACATING MARCH 16, 2012 HEARING ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 2/1/2012)
January 30, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 26 JUDGE ILLSTON'S STANDING ORDER (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/30/2012)
January 18, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 19 RECUSAL ORDER. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 1/18/12. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/18/2012)
November 23, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 15 STIPULATION AND ORDER RE 14 TO STAY PROCEEDINGS FOR SIXTY DAYS AND FURTHER EXTEND DEFENDANTS' TIME TO FILE A RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 11/23/11. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/23/2011)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Len v. JPMorgan Chase, NA et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Vanna Len
Represented By: Deborah Pauline Gutierrez
Represented By: Gordon Flint Dickson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JPMorgan Chase, NA
Represented By: Elizabeth V. Coleman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bank of America N.A.
Represented By: Patricia Laurel Victory
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?