United States of America v. Gonzales & Gonzales Bonds & Insurance Agency, Inc. et al
| United States of America |
| Gonzales & Gonzales Bonds & Insurance Agency, Inc. and American Surety Company, Inc. |
| 3:2011cv04794 |
| September 27, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| Los Angeles |
| Edward M. Chen |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
34
CONDITIONAL DISMISSAL ORDER. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 2/9/16. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/9/2016)
|
|
Filing
33
ORDER REMANDING BONDS TO DHS FOR RECONSIDERATION re 32 Proposed Order filed by American Surety Company, Inc., Gonzales & Gonzales Bonds & Insurance Agency, Inc. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 2/1/16. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/1/2016)
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER by Judge Edward M. Chen Granting 12 Plaintiff's Motion to Stay. (emcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/16/2011)
|
|
Filing
22
STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO ANSWER re 21 Stipulation filed by Gonzales & Gonzales Bonds & Insurance Agency, Inc.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 12/5/11. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/5/2011)
|
|
Filing
10
STANDING ORDER. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 10/13/2011. (tmi, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/13/2011)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
