Chartis Specialty Insurance Company v. Telegraph Hill Properties, Inc. et al
Chartis Specialty Insurance Company |
W. B. Coyle and Telegraph Hill Properties, Inc. |
3:2011cv05696 |
November 28, 2011 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Francisco Office |
XX US, Outside State |
Jacqueline Scott Corley |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 88 JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 8/4/14. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/4/2014) |
Filing 66 ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS, GRANTING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DENYING RELIEF FROM AUTOMATIC ADMISSIONS by Judge Richard Seeborg granting 40 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 45 Motion to Dismiss; denying 50 Motion (tlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/16/2013) |
Filing 41 SCHEDULING ORDER. Further Case Management Conference set for 6/6/2013 10:00 AM in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 1/24/13. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/25/2013) |
Filing 34 CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER. Case Referred to Mediation. Further Case Management Conference set for 3/28/2013 10:00 AM in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 8/9/12. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/9/2012) |
Filing 28 ORDER SETTING ASIDE DEFAULTS ENTERED AGAINST TELEGRAPH HILLS PROPERTIES, INC. AND W.B. COYLE. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 7/26/12. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/26/2012) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.