Pipkin et al v. Carrier IQ, Inc et al Featured Case
Plaintiff: Daniel Pipkin and Chad Ulrich
Defendant: Carrier IQ, Inc, Samsung Electronics America, Inc., HTC America, Inc. and Samsung Telecommunications America, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2011cv05820
Filed: December 2, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: San Francisco Office
County: Santa Clara
Presiding Judge: Edward M. Chen
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 7, 2011 Filing 6 Notice of Administrative Motion and Motion to Consider Whether Cases should be Related (Kenny et al v. Carrier IQ, Inc et al, Case No. 5:11-cv-05774-PSG, Steiner v. Carrier IQ, Inc, Case No. 5:11-cv-05802-HRL. Thomas, et al v. Carrier IQ Inc, et al, Case No. 5:11-cv-05819-HRL, Pipkin et al v. Carrier IQ, Inc et al, Case No. 5:11-cv-05820-HRL, Silvera et al v. Carrier IQ, Inc et al, Case No. 3:11-cv-05821-SI, Padilla et al v. Carrier IQ, Inc, Case No. 5:11-cv-05975-HRL) filed by Jennifer Sue Patrick. (Rothken, Ira) (Filed on 12/7/2011) Modified on 12/8/2011 (bw, COURT STAFF). (Entered: 12/07/2011)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Pipkin et al v. Carrier IQ, Inc et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Daniel Pipkin
Represented By: Thomas Kay Boardman
Represented By: Clifford H. Pearson
Represented By: Bobby Pouya
Represented By: Aaron M. Sheanin
Represented By: Bruce Lee Simon
Represented By: Daniel L. Warshaw
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Chad Ulrich
Represented By: Thomas Kay Boardman
Represented By: Clifford H. Pearson
Represented By: Bobby Pouya
Represented By: Aaron M. Sheanin
Represented By: Bruce Lee Simon
Represented By: Daniel L. Warshaw
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Carrier IQ, Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Samsung Electronics America, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: HTC America, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Samsung Telecommunications America, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?