Kelly v. Roker et al
Lisa Simone Kelly |
Wally Roker, Andy Stroud, Inc. and Andrew B. Stroud |
3:2011cv05822 |
December 2, 2011 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Francisco Office |
San Francisco |
Jeffrey S. White |
Other Fraud |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 128 ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE FOR W. CHARLES ROBINSON. Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 3/7/13. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/7/2013) |
Filing 123 ORDER DENYING APPLICATION FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE.. Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 2/8/13. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/8/2013) |
Filing 55 ORDER DIRECTING PARTIES TO MEET AND CONFER. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 3/14/12. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/14/2012) |
Filing 53 ORDER DENYING 14 Motion to Disqualify Counsel. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on March 13, 2012. (jswlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/13/2012) |
Filing 52 ORDER VACATING Hearing on 15 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on March 12, 2012. (jswlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/12/2012) |
Filing 40 ORDER GRANTING AS MODIFIED 38 STIPULATION to Appear by Telephone. COUNSEL SHALL FILE A NOTICE WITH THE COURT DESIGNATING A DIRECT LANDLINE TELEPHONE NUMBER AT WHICH SHE MAY BE REACHED FOR THE HEARING. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 2/16/12. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/16/2012) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.