Quigley v. Verizon Wireless et al
| Rodney J. Quigley |
| 21st Century Insurance Group, Inc., Waste Management, Inc., Receivable Management Services Corporation, Zurich Financial Services, CBC Innovis, Inc., Convergent Resources, Inc., ER Solutions, Inc., Cello Partnership, HSBC Finance Corporation, Verizon Wireless, Verizon Communications, Inc. and Vodaphone Group PLC |
| 3:2011cv06212 |
| December 12, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| San Francisco |
| Maria-Elena James |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
64
ORDER, Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte. Hon. Edward M. Chen no longer assigned to the case.. Signed by Executive Committee on 9/14/12. (ha, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/14/2012)
|
|
Filing
61
ORDER RE: ATTENDANCE OF SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE BY TELEPHONE. Signed by Judge Elizabeth D Laporte on 7/17/2012. (kns, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/17/2012)
|
|
Filing
53
ORDER by Judge Edward M. Chen Granting in Part and Denying in Part 46 Convergent Defendants' Motion to Dismiss. (emcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/30/2012)
|
|
Filing
24
STANDING ORDER. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 1/24/12. (Mailed to Plaintiff)(bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/24/2012) Modified on 1/24/2012 (bpf, COURT STAFF).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
