First Republic Bank v. A & E Unlimited et al
| First Republic Bank |
| Robert G. Padrick, State of California Board of Equalization, State of California Employment Development Department, A & E Unlimited, Internal Revenue Service and West Coast Aggregates, Inc. |
| 3:2011cv06266 |
| December 13, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| San Francisco |
| Jacqueline Scott Corley |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
44
ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on 7/3/2012. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/3/2012)
|
|
Filing
42
ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF COURT TO DISTRIBUTE INTERPLEADER FUNDS. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on 6/4/2012. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/4/2012)
|
|
Filing
33
ORDER DIRECTING DEPOSIT OF FUNDS AND SCHEDULING MARCH 22, 2012 CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE (Dkt. No. 7). Case Management Conference set for 3/22/2012 01:30 PM in Courtroom F, 15th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on 3/5/2012. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/5/2012)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER RE STATUS UPDATE ON DEFENDANT INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on 2/15/2012. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/15/2012)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
