Frustere v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
| Richard A. Frustere |
| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and Brendan Murphy |
| 3:2011cv06395 |
| December 18, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| San Mateo |
| Maxine M. Chesney |
| All Other Real Property |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
106
ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF'S MOTIONS FILED JUNE 22, 2013. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on June 25, 2013. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/25/2013)
|
|
Filing
98
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S 84 MOTION FOR SANCTIONS; ORDER OF DISMISSAL. The above-titled action is dismissed with prejudice and defendant is awarded attorney's fees in the amount of $2037. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on June 21, 2013. (mmclc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/21/2013)
|
|
Filing
79
AMENDED ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. The sole amendment is to change the figure at line 22 on page 2. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on April 24, 2013. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/24/2013)
|
|
Filing
63
ORDER DISMISSING DEFENDANT BRENDAN MURPHY WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on December 12, 2012. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/12/2012)
|
|
Filing
40
ORDER EXTENDING MEDIATION DEADLINE. The deadline to complete mediation is extended by 90 days. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on July 24, 2012. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/24/2012)
|
|
Filing
37
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS. Plaintiff's Second Cause of Action ("Intentional Misrepresentation") is dismissed with leave to amend. Plaintiff's Eighth Cause of Action ("Negligence") is dismissed without leave to amend. Plaintiff's Third Amended Complaint, if any, shall be filed no later than August 17, 2012. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on July 13, 2012. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/13/2012)
|
|
Filing
33
PRETRIAL PREPARATION ORDER. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on 5/25/12. (tlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/25/2012)
|
|
Filing
27
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS. The hearing scheduled for April 20, 2012 is vacated. Frustere's Second Amended Complaint, if any, shall be filed no later than May 9, 2012. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on April 18, 2012. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/18/2012)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. In light of the pending Motion to Dismiss, the Case Management Conference currently scheduled for April 6, 2012 is continued to May 25, 2012. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on March 29, 2012. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/29/2012)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER DENYING AS MOOT DEFENDANT WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.'S MOTION TO DISMISS. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on February 23, 2012. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/23/2012)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER TO ALLOW FILING OF FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT. Good cause appearing, the Court orders that plaintiff be allowed to file the attached First Amended Complaint. Plaintiff shall file his first amended complaint no later than three court days from the filing of this order. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on February 14, 2012. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/14/2012)
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER VACATING HEARING ON DEFENDANT WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.'S MOTION TO DISMISS. The Court deems the matter submitted on the moving papers and vacates the hearing scheduled for February 24, 2012. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on February 8, 2012. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/8/2012)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
