Sowinski v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Plaintiff: Richard Sowinski
Defendant: Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Case Number: 3:2011cv06431
Filed: December 20, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: San Francisco Office
County: Alameda
Presiding Judge: Samuel Conti
Nature of Suit: Foreclosure
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 2, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 78 STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Signed by Judge Samuel Conti on 05/02/2014. (tmi, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/2/2014)
January 31, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 70 STIPULATION AND ORDER to Extend Deadline re Dispositive Motions and Trial Dates. Motion Hearing set for 4/18/2014 10:00 AM in Courtroom 1, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Samuel Conti. Signed by Judge Samuel Conti on 01/31/2014. (tmi, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/31/2014)
January 16, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 68 STIPULATION AND ORDER to Further Extend Deadline for Hearing Dispositive Motions and to Continue Trial. Jury Trial and Jury Selection set for 4/7/2014 09:30 AM in Courtroom 1, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Samuel Conti. Motion Hearing s et for 3/7/2014 10:00 AM in Courtroom 1, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Samuel Conti. Pretrial Conference set for 4/4/2014 10:00 AM in Courtroom 1, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Samuel Conti. Signed by Judge Samuel Conti on 1/16/2014. (tmi, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/16/2014)
July 26, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 62 STATUS CONFERENCE ORDER. Trial date and schedule set. Signed by Judge Samuel Conti on 07/26/2013. (tmi, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/26/2013)
June 4, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 58 Order by Hon. Samuel Conti granting in part and denying in part 51 Motion to Dismiss.(sclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/4/2013)
February 26, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 49 ORDER by Judge Samuel Conti granting in part and denying in part 39 Motion to Dismiss; granting 41 Motion to Expunge Lis Pendens. (sclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/26/2013)
November 26, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 37 Order by Hon. Samuel Conti granting 18 Motion to Dismiss and denying 19 Motion to Expunge Lis Pendens.(sclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/26/2012)
July 30, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 30 ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 7/30/2012. (dmrlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/30/2012)
May 24, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER STAYING CASE PENDING MEDIATION. Signed by Judge Samuel Conti on 05/24/2012. Case is stayed until Aug. 24, 2012. (sclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/24/2012)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sowinski v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Richard Sowinski
Represented By: Michael Joseph Martin
Represented By: Anthony George Graham
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Represented By: Robert Arthur Bailey
Represented By: Yaw-Jiun Wu
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?