Advanced Multilevel Concepts, Inc. et al v. Stalt, Inc. et al
Advanced Multilevel Concepts, Inc. and Able Direct Marketing |
Stalt, Inc., Hillard M. Sterling and Freeborn & Peters LLP |
3:2011cv06679 |
December 28, 2011 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Francisco Office |
San Mateo |
Samuel Conti |
Other Contract |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Defendant |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 81 STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSING CASE (tdm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/14/2012) |
Filing 73 ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 8/21/2012. (dmrlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/21/2012) |
Filing 70 Order by Hon. Samuel Conti denying 58 Motion for Attorney Fees.(sclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/7/2012) |
Filing 57 ORDER by Judge Samuel Conti denying 34 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; denying 50 Motion for Sanctions; granting 27 Motion to Dismiss; denying 29 Motion to Strike (sclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/21/2012) |
Filing 39 STIPULATION AND ORDER Re: FRCP 26 Initial Disclosures and ADR Stipulation. The deadline for all parties to complete initial disclosures and file the Rule 26(f) Report is Friday, May 25, 2012. The parties shall file either Stipulation to ADR Process or Notice of Need for ADR Process by May 25, 2012. (tdm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/29/2012) |
Filing 36 STIPULATION AND ORDER Extending time to Respond and Reply to Motion to Dismiss,. Signed by Judge Samuel Conti on 3/15/12. (tdm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/15/2012) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.