Patton v. Phoenix School of Law
| Angela Patton |
| Phoenix School of Law |
| 3:2011mc80168 |
| July 14, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| Susan Illston |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 20, 2011. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 1 Motion to Issue Subpoena by Angela Patton. (Attachments: # 1 Issued Subpoena)(ga, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/14/2011) Fee Paid $39.00, Receipt #34611062171 |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Patton v. Phoenix School of Law | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Angela Patton | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Phoenix School of Law | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
