The Republic of Ecuador et al v. Kelsh
The Republic of Ecuador and Diego Garcia Carrion |
Michael A. Kelsh |
3:2011mc80171 |
July 2, 2011 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Francisco Office |
Charles R. Breyer |
Other |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 79 ORDER REGARDING TOPICS AT DISCOVERY CONFERENCE 78 . Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins on 4/26/12. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/26/2012) |
Filing 72 ORDER by Judge Charles R. Breyer denying 59 Motion for Relief from Certain Aspects of Magistrate Judge Cousins's March 9, 2012 Order. (crblc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/12/2012) |
Filing 71 ORDER re 65 MOTION for Extension of Stay. Signed by Judge Nathanael M. Cousins on 4/11/2012. (nclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/11/2012) |
Filing 58 ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 40 MOTION to Compel. Signed by Judge Nathanael M. Cousins on 03/09/12. (nclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/9/2012) |
Filing 50 ORDER RE 40 Motion to Compel Production of Documents. Signed by Judge Nathanael M. Cousins on December 21, 2011. (nclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/21/2011) |
Filing 46 ORDER re 40 Motion to Compel. Signed by Judge Nathanael M. Cousins on December 12, 2011. (nclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/12/2011) |
Filing 34 ORDER granting re 9 MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice of Eric W. Bloom. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 9/14/11. (fj, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/14/2011) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.