Viewsonic Corporation v. AU Optronics Corporation et al
| Viewsonic Corporation |
| Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc., AU Optronics Corporation, AU Optronics Corporation America, Inc., Chi Mei Corporation, Chi Mei Innolux Corporation, Chi Mei Optoelectronics USA, Inc., CMO Japan Co. Ltd., Nexgen Mediatech, Inc., Nexgen Mediatech USA, Inc., Chunghwa Picture Tubes Ltd., Tatung Company of America, Inc., Epson Imaging Devices Corporation, Epson Electronics America, Inc., Hannstar Display Corporation, LG Display Co. Ltd., LG Display America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Semiconductor, Inc., Sharp Corporation, Sharp Electronics Corporation, Toshiba Mobile Display Co., Ltd., Toshiba Corporation and Toshiba America Electronics Components, Inc. |
| 3:2012cv00335 |
| January 20, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| Los Angeles |
| Susan Illston |
| Antitrust |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 15 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
120
ORDER dismissing Chunghwa Picture Tubes, Ltd.. Signed by Judge Susan Illston on 12/13/13. (tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/7/2014)
|
|
Filing
111
ORDER by Judge Susan Illston granting (8487) Stipulation in case 3:07-md-01827-SI re Dismissal with Prejudice as to Toshiba (tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/5/2013)
|
|
Filing
109
ORDER by Judge Susan Illston granting (8400) Stipulation in case 3:07-md-01827-SI re Dismissal with Prejudice as to HannStar filed by Viewsonic Corporation. (tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/6/2013)
|
|
Filing
81
Order Extending Time for Plaintiff ViewSonic Corporation to Answer or Respond to Defendants LG Display Co., Ltd. and LG Display America, Inc.'s Counterclaims for Declarative Relief signed by Judge Illston on 1/17/13 78 (tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/24/2013) Modified on 1/24/2013 (ysS, COURT STAFF).
|
|
Filing
80
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' MOTIONS TO DISMISS LG DISPLAYAMERICA, INC. AND LG DISPLAY CO., LTD.'S COUNTERCLAIMS AND STRIKE THEIR DEFENSES CONCERNING DUPLICATIVE RECOVERY (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 1/23/2013)
|
|
Filing
61
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 60 Stipulation filed by Toshiba Corporation, Toshiba America Electronics Components, Inc., Toshiba Mobile Display Co., Ltd., Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc. Extending Time to Answer Second Amended Complaint by December 19, 2012. Signed by Judge Susan Illston on 12/10/12. (tlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/10/2012)
|
|
Filing
58
ORDER GRANTING IN PART DEFENDANTS' JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS (VIEWSONIC) 7023 (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 11/28/2012)
|
|
Filing
51
ORDER of dismissal (see order for details) 7013 . Signed by Judge Susan Illston on 10/22/12. (tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/23/2012)
|
|
Filing
42
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS' JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS (VIEWSONIC) 6392 in case 3:07-md-01827-SI; 33 in case 3:12-cv-00335-SI (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 9/26/2012)
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER DENYING VIEWSONICS MOTION TO FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT UNDER SEAL 22 (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 7/10/2012)
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF VIEWSONIC'S MOTION FOR AN ORDER AUTHORIZING PLAINTIFF TO SERVE DEFENDANT CHUNGHWA PICTURE TUBES, LTD. THROUGH ITS U.S. COUNSEL 5309 11 (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 3/29/2012)
|
|
Filing
6
Pretrial ORDER #1. Signed by Judge Susan Illston on 7/3/7. (ysS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/24/2012)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
