Baner v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
Plaintiff: William B. Baner
Defendant: Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and Cal-Western Reconveyance Corporation
Case Number: 3:2012cv01189
Filed: March 9, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: San Francisco Office
County: San Mateo
Presiding Judge: Elizabeth D. Laporte
Nature of Suit: Foreclosure
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1444
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 3, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 38 STIPULATION AND ORDER AS MODIFIED, CONTINUING BRIEFING SCHEDULE: Reset Deadlines as to 35 MOTION to Dismiss The First Amended Complaint. Responses due by 11/2/2012. Replies due by 11/9/2012. Case Management Statement due by 11/13/2012. Case Management Conference set for 11/27/2012 10:00 AM in Courtroom E, 15th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Elizabeth D Laporte on 10/2/2012. (kns, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/3/2012)
September 10, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 33 STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE: Case Management Statement due by 11/13/2012. Case Management Conference set for 11/20/2012 10:00 AM in Courtroom E, 15th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Elizabeth D Laporte on 9/7/2012. (kns, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/10/2012)
August 28, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 31 ORDER DISCHARGING ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AND VACATING SHOW CAUSE HEARING re 28 Order to Show Cause. Signed by Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte on August 28, 2012. (edllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/28/2012)
August 10, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Order to Show Cause Hearing set for 9/4/2012 02:00 PM. Show Cause Response due by 8/24/2012.. Signed by Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte on August 10, 2012. (edllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/10/2012)
March 21, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 11 STIPULATION AND ORDER re 10 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Setting Briefing Schedule on Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction filed by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. : Motion Hearing set for 5/8/2012 09:00 AM in Courtroom E, 15th Floor, San Francisco before Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte. Motion to be filed and served by 4/2/2012. Responses due by 4/16/2012. Replies due by 4/23/2012.Signed by Judge Elizabeth D Laporte on 3/20/2012. (kns, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/21/2012)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Baner v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: William B. Baner
Represented By: Chris Lee Norris
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Represented By: Michael Rapkine
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Cal-Western Reconveyance Corporation
Represented By: Nicole Kimberly Neff
Represented By: Robin Prema Wright
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?