Montgomery v. National City Mortgage et al
| Larry Montgomery |
| National City Mortgage, PNC Bank, Litton Loan Servicing, OCWEN Loan Servicing, LLC and PNC Bank, N.A. |
| 4:2012cv01359 |
| March 16, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| Alameda |
| Edward M. Chen |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
35
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 34 for Dismissal with Prejudice filed by Larry Montgomery, Motions terminated: 34 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER for Dismissal with Prejudice filed by Larry Montgomery.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 8/2/12. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/2/2012)
|
|
Filing
30
ORDER by Judge Edward M. Chen Denying 16 Plaintiff's Motion to Remand; Granting 12 Defendants National City Mortgage and PNC Bank's Motion to Dismiss; and Granting in Part and Denying in Part 17 Defendants Litton Loan Servicing and Ocwen Loan Servicing's Motion to Dismiss. (emcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/31/2012)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER FOR SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING re 12 Amended MOTION to Dismiss Complaint and Each Claim Therein; Memorandum of Points and Authorities In Support filed by PNC Bank, N.A., 16 MOTION to Remand filed by Larry Montgomery. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 5/1/12. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/1/2012)
|
|
Filing
15
STANDING ORDER. Signed by Judge EDWARD M. CHEN on 4/5/12. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/5/2012)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
