Turner et al v. General Electronic Company et al
| Virginia Turner, William Turner, Linda Lee Turner, Kenneth Turner and Alice M. King |
| Crown Cork & Seal Company, Inc., General Electronic Company and Huntington Ingalls Incorporated |
| 3:2012cv01600 |
| March 30, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Edward M. Chen |
| P.I. : Asbestos |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
17
ORDER granting 15 STIPULATION DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF DEFENDANT GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY filed by Kenneth Turner, Linda Lee Turner, William Turner, Alice M. King, Virginia Turner. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 11/26/2014. General Electronic Company terminated. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/26/2014)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER RE: SETTLEMENT STATUS. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on 9/29/2014. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/29/2014)
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER, Case reassigned to Hon. Charles R. Breyer. Hon. Edward M. Chen no longer assigned to the case.. Signed by Executive Committee on 9/22/14. (ha, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/22/2014)
|
|
Filing
6
CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER by MDL Panel TRANSFERRING CASE to the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. (slh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/17/2012)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
