Ross v. Sioux Honey Association, Cooperative
Plaintiff: Soraya Ross
Defendant: Sioux Honey Association, Cooperative
Case Number: 3:2012cv01645
Filed: April 2, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: San Francisco Office
County: Los Angeles
Presiding Judge: William Alsup
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 14, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 64 ORDER by Judge Edward M. Chen Granting 49 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss. (emcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/14/2013)
October 24, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 52 STIPULATION AND ORDER re 50 EXTENSION OF TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE HER OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS THIRD AMENDED CLASS ACTIO filed by Soraya Ross. Responses due by 10/30/2012. Replies due by 11/6/2012.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 10/24/12. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/24/2012)
September 27, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 46 STIPULATION AND ORDER re 45 CONCERNING EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO FILE ITS RESPONSIVE PLEADING TO PLAINTIFFS THIRD AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT filed by Soraya Ross. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 9/27/12. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/27/2012)
September 5, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 39 ORDER DENYING TRANSFER by MDL Panel. (slh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/5/2012)
August 14, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 33 STIPULATION AND ORDER re 28 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint STIPULATION CONCERNING EXTENSION OF TIME FOR PLAINTIFF ROSS TO FILE AN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS AND [PROPOSED] OR, 28 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint. Responses due by 8/20/2012. Replies due by 8/27/2012.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 8/14/12. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/14/2012)
July 9, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 16 STIPULATION AND ORDER re 15 for leave to file an Amended Complaint and Extending Time for Sioux Honey Assoc. to File a Responsive Pleading filed by Sioux Honey Association, Cooperative. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 7/9/12. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/9/2012)
May 10, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 10 STANDING ORDER. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 5/10/12. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/10/2012)
April 9, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 7 NOTICE REGARDING FACTORS TO BE EVALUATED FOR ANY PROPOSED CLASS SETTLEMENT. Signed by Judge Alsup on April 9, 2012. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/9/2012)
April 6, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER, Case reassigned to Hon. William Alsup. Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler no longer assigned to the case. Signed by Executive Committee on 4/6/12. (ha, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/6/2012)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ross v. Sioux Honey Association, Cooperative
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Soraya Ross
Represented By: Paul R. Kiesel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sioux Honey Association, Cooperative
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?