Resilient Floor Covering Pension Trust Fund et al v. Heritage Floors, Inc. et al
| Resilient Floor Covering Pension Trust Fund and Board of Trustees, Resilient Floor Covering Pension Trust Fund |
| Heritage Floors, Inc. and Creative Tile and Flooring, Inc. |
| 3:2012cv01784 |
| April 10, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| Alameda |
| Laurel Beeler |
| Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1001 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
28
ORDER Setting Briefing Schedule Re 25 MOTION for Default Judgment. Signed by Judge Nathanael M. Cousins on 1/08/2013. (nclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/8/2013)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Show Cause Response due by 9/27/2012.. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 9/12/12. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/12/2012)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER GRANTING 14 MOTION to Extend Dates:Case Management Statement due by 11/30/2012. Initial Case Management Conference set for 12/7/2012 01:30 PM in Courtroom 11, 19th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 8/10/12. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/10/2012)
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER, Case reassigned to Hon. Jeffrey S. White. Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler no longer assigned to the case. Signed by Executive Committee on 6/22/12. (ha, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/22/2012)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
