Cooke et al v. Liles et al
| Alan A. Cooke and Gage T. Cooke |
| Paul Gallegos, Mike Hislop, County of Humboldt, Terry Liles, Murl Harpham, Steve Watson, Marvin Kirkpatrick, Michael Medlin, Humboldt County Sheriff's Office, City of Eureka and Eureka Police Department |
| 1:2012cv01844 |
| April 12, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| San Francisco |
| Edward M. Chen |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
44
ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 7/12/13. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/12/2013)
|
|
Filing
35
ORDER by Judge ARMSTRONG denying 32 Motion for Leave to Appeal (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/26/2013)
|
|
Filing
30
ORDER by Judge ARMSTRONG granting 3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; terminating 20 Motion to Continue; terminating 24 Motion ; denying 25 Motion to Disqualify Judge; terminating 25 Motion for Recusal. ; terminating 26 Motion (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/25/2013)
|
|
Filing
9
SUA SPONTE JUDICIAL REFERRAL FOR PURPOSES OF DETERMINING RELATIONSHIP OF CASES. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 5/18/12. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/18/2012)
|
|
Filing
8
STANDING ORDER (copy mailed to Plaintiff). Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 5/17/12. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/17/2012)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
