Lander v. Hunt & Henriques et al
Alicia Lander |
Hunt & Henriques and Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC |
3:2012cv01867 |
April 13, 2012 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Francisco Office |
Alameda |
Laurel Beeler |
Other Statutory Actions |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 42 ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Signed by Judge Thelton E. Henderson on 07/10/2013. (tmi, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/10/2013) |
Filing 39 STIPULATION AND ORDER Removing Action from ADR. Signed by Judge Thelton E. Henderson on 04/08/2013. (tmi, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/8/2013) |
Filing 32 STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE Settlement Conference set for 4/10/2013 10:00 AM, in a courtroom to be determined. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 1/8/13. (sisS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/8/2013) |
Filing 30 STIPULATION AND ORDER Continuing Mediation Completion Deadline. Signed by Judge Thelton E. Henderson on 12/06/2012. (tmi, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/6/2012) |
Filing 28 STIPULATION AND ORDER Granting Extension of ADR Completion Date. Signed by Judge Thelton E. Henderson on 09/25/2012. (tmi, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/26/2012) |
Filing 19 STIPULATION AND ORDER Selecting ADR Process re 15 . Case Referred to Mediation. Signed by Judge Thelton E. Henderson on 08/21/2012. (tmi, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/22/2012) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.