Yevgeniy Davidovich v. County of San Mateo et al
| Yevgeniy Davidovich |
| County of San Mateo, Greg Munks and Does |
| 3:2012cv02148 |
| May 1, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| William Alsup |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
108
ORDER CONTINUING SETTLEMENT COMPLIANCE HEARING, TRIAL DATES. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on February 6, 2014. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/6/2014)
|
|
Filing
106
ORDER RE: NOTICE OF PENDING SETTLEMENT re 104 Notice filed by Yevgeniy Davidovich. Settlement Compliance Hearing set for 2/6/2014 at 2:00 PM in Courtroom 9, 19th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on January 9, 2014. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/9/2014)
|
|
Filing
81
Order by Magistrate Judge Nathanael M. Cousins granting in part and denying in part 69 Motion to Compel Rule 35 Examinations. (nclc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/15/2013)
|
|
Filing
70
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH SUBPOENA ISSUED TO THE NATIONAL PERSONNEL RECORDS CENTER. Order to Show Cause Hearing set for 4/30/2013 at 9:00 AM. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on March 27, 2013. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/27/2013)
|
|
Filing
40
SUPPLEMENTAL ORDER TO ORDER SETTING INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE re 39 Clerks Notice. Signed by Judge William Alsup on 7/6/11. (dt, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/25/2012)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
