Allen v. Bayshore Mall et al
| Jessica Allen |
| Bayshore Mall and General Growth Properties, Inc. |
| 1:2012cv02368 |
| May 10, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| Humboldt |
| Jeffrey S. White |
| Other Personal Injury |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
147
MINUTE ORDER NOTING DISMISSAL re 144 Order, 146 Stipulation filed by Jessica Allen. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on July 8, 2014. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/8/2014)
|
|
Filing
144
ORDER TO FILE STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL re 142 Settlement Conference. Dismissal or Statement due by 6/19/2014. Further Case Management Conference set for 7/9/2014 at 2:00 PM in Courtroom 9, 19th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on May 6, 2014. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/6/2014)
|
|
Filing
141
ORDER re 140 Letter filed by General Growth Properties, Inc. Excusing Attendance at Settlement Conference. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 05/02/2014. (dmrlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/2/2014)
|
|
Filing
136
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT by Judge Jon S. Tigar denying 87 Motion for Summary Judgment. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/23/2014)
|
|
Filing
119
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, MOTION FOR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION ON THE ISSUE OF PUNITIVE DAMAGES by Judge Jon S. Tigar, denying 86 Motion for Summary Judgment. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/16/2014)
|
|
Filing
106
ORDER VACATING MOTION HEARING re 86 Joint MOTION for Summary Judgment Motion for Partial Summary Judgment or in the Alternative Motion for Summary Adjudication filed by Bayshore Mall; 87 MOTION for Summary Judgment Notice of Motion and Motion for Summary Adjudication filed by Jessica Allen. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on March 11, 2014. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/11/2014)
|
|
Filing
81
ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT by Judge Jon S. Tigar, granting 71 Motion for Leave to File. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/9/2013)
|
|
Filing
64
SCHEDULING ORDER granting 60 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER to Continue Discovery and Dispositive Motion Deadlines filed by Bayshore Mall. Expert Disclosures due by 9/16/2013. Expert Rebuttal due by 10/7/2013. Fact and Expert Discove ry due by 11/14/2013. Dispositive Motions due by 1/31/2014. Pretrial Conference Statement due by 4/15/2014. Final Pretrial Conference set for 4/25/2014 at 2:00 PM in Courtroom 9, 19th Floor, San Francisco. Jury Trial set for 5/12/2014 - 5/19/2013 at 8:30 AM in Courtroom 9, 19th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Jon S. Tigar. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on July 12, 2013. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/12/2013)
|
|
Filing
30
ORDER GRANTING 28 Substitution of Counsel. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on January 24, 2013. (jswlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/24/2013)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER SCHEDULING TRIAL AND PRETRIAL MATTERS. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 11/14/12. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/14/2012)
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER Case Management Statement due by 10/26/2012. Initial Case Management Conference set for 11/2/2012 01:30 PM in Courtroom 11, 19th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 8/22/12. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/22/2012)
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER, Case reassigned to Hon. Jeffrey S. White. Magistrate Judge Nandor J. Vadas no longer assigned to the case. Signed by Executive Committee on 5/29/12. (ha, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/29/2012)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
