Weiss v. Vidyo, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Julie Weiss
Defendant: Vidyo, Inc. and Asish Gupta
Case Number: 3:2012cv02391
Filed: May 11, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: San Francisco Office
County: San Mateo
Presiding Judge: Maxine M. Chesney
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 1, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 33 ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO REMAND; VACATING HEARING. The hearing scheduled for August 3, 2012 is vacated. Weiss' Motion to Remand is granted and the above-titled action is remanded to the Superior Court of the State of California, in and for the County of San Mateo. Weiss's request for an award of attorneys' fees is denied. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on August 1, 2012. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/1/2012)
June 27, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 30 ORDER CONTINUING HEARING DATES. Plaintiff's Motion to Remand is continued to August 3, 2012, and Defendants' Motion to Compel Arbitration is continued to August 17, 2012. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on June 27, 2012. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/27/2012)
June 21, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER RE: DEFENDANTS' ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION WHETHER CASES ARE RELATED; AND, IF THE CASES ARE DEEMED NOT RELATED, TO RESET THE BRIEFING SCHEDULE. The deadline for filing defendants' opposition to plaintiff's Motion to Remand is extended to June 20, 2012. The deadline for filing plaintiff's reply is extended to June 29, 2012. The hearing on plaintiff's Motion to Remand remains as scheduled on July 13, 2012. The deadline for filing defendants' rep ly in support of defendants' Motion to Dismiss and to Compel Arbitration is extended to June 20, 2012. The hearing on defendants' Motion to Dismiss and to Compel Arbitration is continued to July 27, 2012. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on June 21, 2012. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/21/2012)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Weiss v. Vidyo, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Julie Weiss
Represented By: Francisco Xavier Marquez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Vidyo, Inc.
Represented By: John Charles Post
Represented By: Michael Gayland Pedhirney
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Asish Gupta
Represented By: Michael Gayland Pedhirney
Represented By: John Charles Post
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?