Bell-Sparrow v. Wiltz et al
Arlene Bell-Sparrow |
Paul Wiltz, Mone't Inc. and Wonda McGowan |
3:2012cv02782 |
May 31, 2012 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Francisco Office |
Alameda |
Laurel Beeler |
Other Fraud |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 104 JUDGMENT (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 3/31/2015) |
Filing 96 CORRECTED ORDER RE: PRO TEM TRANSCRIPT (tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/20/2015) |
Filing 79 ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AGAINST DEFENDANT McGOWAN 70 (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 6/27/2014) |
Filing 74 ORDER (1) CONTINUING HEARING ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; AND (2) ISSUING RAND NOTICE (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 5/9/2014) |
Filing 61 ORDER (1) GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT MCGOWAN'S MOTION TO DISMISS OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; (2) DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO COMPEL; AND (3) CONTINUING THE HEARING ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT TO 3:00 P.M.ON FEBRUARY 7, 2014 58 60 (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 2/4/2014) Modified on 2/4/2014 (Illston, Susan). |
Filing 40 ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SERVICE BY PUBLICATION AND DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUBSTITUTE SERVICE 23 32 (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 5/15/2013) |
Filing 27 ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO AMEND; DENYING AS MOOT DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS; SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 15 21 (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 2/8/2013) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.