Luidia, Inc. v. Pen and Free Co., Ltd. et al
| Luidia, Inc. |
| Pen and Free Co., Ltd. and Peerless Industries, Inc. |
| 3:2012cv02993 |
| June 11, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| San Mateo |
| Laurel Beeler |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
19
ORDER continuing initial case management conference to April 18, 2013 re 17 stipulation. Signed by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler 3/21/2013.(lblc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/21/2013)
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER regarding Plaintiff's Service of Defendants. Under the circumstances, the court finds that the Plaintiff provided good cause for the delay in satisfying the requirements of Rule 4(m) and extends the time for service to encompass the filin g of the Waiver on October 15, 2012. As concerns Peerless Industries, Luidia need not serve it, as Luidia dismissed its claims against it on October 15, 2012. Notice of Voluntary Dismissal, ECF No. 8 . Signed by Judge Laurel Beeler on 10/16/2012. (lblc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/16/2012)
|
|
Filing
6
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Show Cause Response due by 10/19/2012. The October 11, 2012 Initial Case Management Conference is VACATED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler on 10/10/2012. (lblc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/10/2012)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
